Editing
Daniel Lehmann's Research on Default Reasoning
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
Title: Daniel Lehmann's Research on Default Reasoning Abstract: Daniel Lehmann proposed a logic of normal defaults that is rich enough not to require the consideration of non-normal defaults. His lexicographic closure method provides a rational extension of a given set of normal defaults, which is different from Reiter's logic of defaults. The lexicographic closure is essentially a rational exten sion of D and its rational closure, defined in a previous paper. It provides a logic of normal defaults that is different from Reiter's logic and is rich enough not to require the consideration of non-normal defaults. A large number of examples are provided to show that the lexicographic closure corresponds to the basic intuitions behind Reiter's logic of defaults. Research Question: How can we develop a logic of normal defaults that is rich enough not to require the consideration of non-normal defaults, while still providing a rational extension of a given set of normal defaults? Methodology: Lehmann's research uses a set of normal defaults D and a fact a. The lexicographic closure of D is defined, which is essentially a rational exten sion of D and its rational closure. The lexicographic closure provides a logic of normal defaults that is different from Reiter's logic and is rich enough not to require the consideration of non-normal defaults. Results: The lexicographic closure method provides a rational extension of a given set of normal defaults. It is essentially a rational exten sion of D and its rational closure, which is different from Reiter's logic of defaults. A large number of examples are provided to show that the lexicographic closure corresponds to the basic intuitions behind Reiter's logic of defaults. Implications: Lehmann's research provides a logic of normal defaults that is rich enough not to require the consideration of non-normal defaults. This logic is different from Reiter's logic and provides a rational extension of a given set of normal defaults. The lexicographic closure method is essentially a rational exten sion of D and its rational closure, which is different from Reiter's logic of defaults. A large number of examples are provided to show that the lexicographic closure corresponds to the basic intuitions behind Reiter's logic of defaults. Link to Article: https://arxiv.org/abs/0203002v1 Authors: arXiv ID: 0203002v1 [[Category:Computer Science]] [[Category:Defaults]] [[Category:Logic]] [[Category:Normal]] [[Category:Closure]] [[Category:S]]
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Simple Sci Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Simple Sci Wiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information