Editing
Interpreter for a Procedural Language
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
Title: Interpreter for a Procedural Language Abstract: This research explores the application of rational trees in creating an interpreter for a procedural language. The study investigates the use of rational trees in logic programming languages that naturally support them, as well as in traditional Prolog, which typically does not perform occurs check. The research presents two interpreters, one that requires non-occurs-check unification, and another that is faster and more economical. Experimental data supports the effectiveness of rational trees, and the study argues that they are a valuable addition to logic programming languages. Main Research Question: Can rational trees be effectively applied to create an interpreter for a procedural language, particularly in logic programming languages that do not naturally support them? Methodology: The research employs the application of rational trees in creating an interpreter for a procedural language. The study focuses on logic programming languages that naturally support rational trees, such as Prolog II and its descendants, as well as traditional Prolog. The research presents two interpreters: one that requires non-occurs-check unification and another that is faster and more economical. The study provides experimental data to support the effectiveness of rational trees and argues for their inclusion in logic programming languages. Results: The research presents two interpreters that demonstrate the effectiveness of rational trees in creating an interpreter for a procedural language. The study provides experimental data that supports the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of rational trees, and argues for their inclusion in logic programming languages. Implications: The research suggests that rational trees can be effectively applied to create an interpreter for a procedural language, even in logic programming languages that do not naturally support them. The study argues that rational trees are a valuable addition to logic programming languages and can improve their performance and efficiency. Link to Article: https://arxiv.org/abs/0403028v1 Authors: arXiv ID: 0403028v1 [[Category:Computer Science]] [[Category:Rational]] [[Category:Trees]] [[Category:Logic]] [[Category:Programming]] [[Category:Languages]]
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Simple Sci Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Simple Sci Wiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information