Editing
Realspace Sovereigns in Cyberspace: The Case of Domain Names
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
Title: Realspace Sovereigns in Cyberspace: The Case of Domain Names Research Question: How do realspace sovereigns, particularly the United States, respond to challenges in cyberspace, specifically in relation to domain names? Methodology: The study uses a combination of legal analysis and international relations theory. It critically examines the United States' response to international disputes over domain names, specifically the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA). The authors analyze the ACPA's provisions related to adjudicative and prescriptive jurisdiction, focusing on Section 1125(d)(2). They also consider the role of realspace sovereigns in the international regulation of the domain names system. Results: The study finds that the ACPA's provisions related to adjudicative jurisdiction are problematic, as they appear to exceed the constitutional requirements for adjudicative jurisdiction in the U.S. courts. The authors conclude that the provision is notable mainly for its aggressive approach to jurisdiction. They also argue that realspace sovereigns, especially the United States, have a critical role in the continued viability of a global unsegmented domain names system. They suggest that regulatory significance of geography and the essentially arbitrary nature of the present territorial locations of the key components of the domain name system lead to incentives for realspace sovereigns to alter the geographic facts, which could result in the segmentation of the domain name system. Implications: The study suggests that realspace sovereigns, particularly the United States, have strong interests in avoiding segmentation of the domain name system. This implies the need for realspace sovereigns to coordinate the regulation of the system. The study also highlights the potential problems with the ACPA's provisions related to adjudicative jurisdiction, which could have implications for the enforcement of trademark rights in domain names. Link to Article: https://arxiv.org/abs/0109086v3 Authors: arXiv ID: 0109086v3 [[Category:Computer Science]] [[Category:Domain]] [[Category:Realspace]] [[Category:Sovereigns]] [[Category:Names]] [[Category:System]]
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Simple Sci Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Simple Sci Wiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information