Craig Alan Feinstein's Evidence That P ≠ NP: Difference between revisions

From Simple Sci Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Title: Craig Alan Feinstein's Evidence That P ≠ NP
Title: Craig Alan Feinstein's Evidence That P ≠ NP


Abstract: Craig Alan Feinstein, a researcher in computer science, proposed a method to solve the Subset-Sum problem, which is a well-known NP-complete problem. His method, called algorithm A, can solve the problem in O(2n^2) time, assuming constant-time arithmetic and linear-time sorting. Feinstein argued that algorithm A is the best method for solving the problem for large inputs, as it efficiently solves two subproblems that are related to each other. This evidence suggests that P ≠ NP, meaning that problems that can be solved by deterministic polynomial-time algorithms are not equivalent to problems that can be solved by nondeterministic polynomial-time algorithms.
Abstract: Craig Alan Feinstein, a researcher in computer science, proposed a method to solve the SUBSET-SUM problem, which is a well-known NP problem. His method, called algorithm A, can solve the problem in a faster time than any other known method. This suggests that P ≠ NP, meaning that problems that can be solved by deterministic polynomial-time algorithms are not the same as those that can be solved by nondeterministic polynomial-time algorithms. This discovery has significant implications for the field of computer science and could potentially revolutionize the way we approach problem-solving.


Main Research Question: Can the class of decision problems that can be solved by deterministic polynomial-time algorithms (P) be equivalent to the class of decision problems that can be solved by nondeterministic polynomial-time algorithms (NP)?
Methodology: Feinstein's algorithm, A, is a deterministic polynomial-time algorithm that can solve the SUBSET-SUM problem. It runs in O(2n^2) time, which is faster than any other known method. Feinstein argues that this algorithm provides evidence that P ≠ NP because it is the fastest known method to solve the problem.


Methodology: Feinstein focused on the Subset-Sum problem, which is a common NP problem. He proposed algorithm A, which sorts the input vectors in ascending order and then compares elements from each list until a match is found or one list runs out of elements. Feinstein argued that this method is the best for solving the problem for large inputs because it efficiently solves two related subproblems.
Results: Feinstein's algorithm, A, has been able to solve the SUBSET-SUM problem in a faster time than any other known method. This suggests that P ≠ NP, as algorithm A is a deterministic polynomial-time algorithm, and the problem it solves is an NP problem.


Results: Feinstein's algorithm A can solve the Subset-Sum problem in O(2n^2) time, assuming constant-time arithmetic and linear-time sorting. This is an improvement over other methods, as it efficiently solves two related subproblems. This evidence suggests that P ≠ NP, as algorithm A is the best method for solving the problem for large inputs.
Implications: If Feinstein's argument is correct, it would mean that P ≠ NP, which is a long-standing question in the field of computer science. This discovery could potentially revolutionize the way we approach problem-solving in computer science and could have far-reaching implications for other fields as well. It could also lead to the development of new algorithms and techniques that could make computer systems more efficient and effective.


Implications: If Feinstein's method is correct, it would mean that P ≠ NP, which is a long-standing open question in the field of computer science. This would have significant implications for the field, as it would mean that there are problems that can be solved more efficiently by nondeterministic algorithms than by deterministic algorithms. This could potentially lead to new algorithms and techniques for solving complex problems.
Link to Article: https://arxiv.org/abs/0310060v7
 
Link to Article: https://arxiv.org/abs/0310060v5
Authors:  
Authors:  
arXiv ID: 0310060v5
arXiv ID: 0310060v7


[[Category:Computer Science]]
[[Category:Computer Science]]
[[Category:Problem]]
[[Category:Np]]
[[Category:Algorithm]]
[[Category:Time]]
[[Category:Time]]
[[Category:Problem]]
[[Category:Can]]
[[Category:Feinstein]]
[[Category:Feinstein]]
[[Category:Np]]

Latest revision as of 14:48, 24 December 2023

Title: Craig Alan Feinstein's Evidence That P ≠ NP

Abstract: Craig Alan Feinstein, a researcher in computer science, proposed a method to solve the SUBSET-SUM problem, which is a well-known NP problem. His method, called algorithm A, can solve the problem in a faster time than any other known method. This suggests that P ≠ NP, meaning that problems that can be solved by deterministic polynomial-time algorithms are not the same as those that can be solved by nondeterministic polynomial-time algorithms. This discovery has significant implications for the field of computer science and could potentially revolutionize the way we approach problem-solving.

Methodology: Feinstein's algorithm, A, is a deterministic polynomial-time algorithm that can solve the SUBSET-SUM problem. It runs in O(2n^2) time, which is faster than any other known method. Feinstein argues that this algorithm provides evidence that P ≠ NP because it is the fastest known method to solve the problem.

Results: Feinstein's algorithm, A, has been able to solve the SUBSET-SUM problem in a faster time than any other known method. This suggests that P ≠ NP, as algorithm A is a deterministic polynomial-time algorithm, and the problem it solves is an NP problem.

Implications: If Feinstein's argument is correct, it would mean that P ≠ NP, which is a long-standing question in the field of computer science. This discovery could potentially revolutionize the way we approach problem-solving in computer science and could have far-reaching implications for other fields as well. It could also lead to the development of new algorithms and techniques that could make computer systems more efficient and effective.

Link to Article: https://arxiv.org/abs/0310060v7 Authors: arXiv ID: 0310060v7

Retrieved from "https://simplesci.org/index.php?title=Craig_Alan_Feinstein%27s_Evidence_That_P_≠_NP&oldid=2859"