DepartmentofComputerScience: Difference between revisions

From Simple Sci Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 3: Line 3:
Research Question: How can we formalize and reason about anonymity in multi-agent systems?
Research Question: How can we formalize and reason about anonymity in multi-agent systems?


Methodology: The authors use the modal logic of knowledge within the context of the runs-and-systems framework, similar to their earlier work on secrecy. They define several types of anonymity with respect to agents, actions, and observers in multi-agent systems, and relate these definitions to other concepts of information hiding. They also provide probabilistic definitions of anonymity to quantify an observer's uncertainty about the system's state.
Methodology: The authors use the modal logic of knowledge in the context of multi-agent systems, building upon their earlier work on secrecy. They define several types of anonymity with respect to agents, actions, and observers, and relate these definitions to other concepts of information hiding.


Results: The authors present several definitions of anonymity, including the concept of indistinguishability, where an observer cannot distinguish between the actions of different agents, and the concept of unobservability, where an observer cannot determine the actions performed by an agent. They relate these definitions to other concepts of information hiding and provide probabilistic definitions to measure anonymity quantitatively.
Results: The authors provide probabilistic definitions of anonymity that allow for quantifying an observer's uncertainty about the system's state. They also relate their definitions of anonymity to other formalizations, such as those in process algebra and information hiding using function views.


Implications: The authors' framework provides a clear and formal way to reason about anonymity in multi-agent systems. This can help in the design and analysis of systems that aim to protect user privacy and maintain information security. The probabilistic definitions of anonymity can also be useful in quantifying the level of privacy provided by a system.
Implications: This work provides a formal framework for reasoning about anonymity in multi-agent systems, which is crucial for ensuring privacy and security in network communications. The framework can be used to analyze and compare the anonymity provided by different systems, and to develop new techniques for maintaining anonymity in complex systems.


Link to Article: https://arxiv.org/abs/0402042v1
Link to Article: https://arxiv.org/abs/0402042v2
Authors:  
Authors:  
arXiv ID: 0402042v1
arXiv ID: 0402042v2


[[Category:Computer Science]]
[[Category:Computer Science]]
[[Category:Anonymity]]
[[Category:Anonymity]]
[[Category:Systems]]
[[Category:Systems]]
[[Category:About]]
[[Category:Multi]]
[[Category:Agent]]
[[Category:Agent]]
[[Category:Definitions]]
[[Category:Can]]

Latest revision as of 16:25, 24 December 2023

Title: DepartmentofComputerScience

Research Question: How can we formalize and reason about anonymity in multi-agent systems?

Methodology: The authors use the modal logic of knowledge in the context of multi-agent systems, building upon their earlier work on secrecy. They define several types of anonymity with respect to agents, actions, and observers, and relate these definitions to other concepts of information hiding.

Results: The authors provide probabilistic definitions of anonymity that allow for quantifying an observer's uncertainty about the system's state. They also relate their definitions of anonymity to other formalizations, such as those in process algebra and information hiding using function views.

Implications: This work provides a formal framework for reasoning about anonymity in multi-agent systems, which is crucial for ensuring privacy and security in network communications. The framework can be used to analyze and compare the anonymity provided by different systems, and to develop new techniques for maintaining anonymity in complex systems.

Link to Article: https://arxiv.org/abs/0402042v2 Authors: arXiv ID: 0402042v2