Chung-chieh Shan: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Title: Chung-chieh Shan | Title: Chung-chieh Shan | ||
Research Question: How can we | Main Research Question: How can we better understand the relationship between polarity sensitivity and evaluation order in language? | ||
Methodology: The | Methodology: The study uses a type-logical analysis to examine how negative and positive polarity items are licensed or prohibited in a given linguistic environment. It employs the programming language concepts of delimited continuations and evaluation order to provide a more empirical coverage than previous proposals. | ||
Results: The | Results: The analysis presents a novel approach to polarity sensitivity, incorporating both semantic properties and syntactic restrictions. It makes correct predictions about the acceptability of certain sentences, such as "Nobody's mother saw anybody's father." | ||
Implications: | Implications: This study contributes to a greater understanding of the syntax-semantics interface in language. It provides a more comprehensive explanation of polarity sensitivity than previous proposals, and its use of programming language concepts opens up new avenues for research in computational linguistics. | ||
Link to Article: https://arxiv.org/abs/ | Link to Article: https://arxiv.org/abs/0404007v1 | ||
Authors: | Authors: | ||
arXiv ID: | arXiv ID: 0404007v1 | ||
[[Category:Computer Science]] | |||
[[Category:Polarity]] | |||
[[Category:Language]] | |||
[[Category:Sensitivity]] | |||
[[Category:It]] | |||
[[Category:Research]] |
Latest revision as of 15:40, 24 December 2023
Title: Chung-chieh Shan
Main Research Question: How can we better understand the relationship between polarity sensitivity and evaluation order in language?
Methodology: The study uses a type-logical analysis to examine how negative and positive polarity items are licensed or prohibited in a given linguistic environment. It employs the programming language concepts of delimited continuations and evaluation order to provide a more empirical coverage than previous proposals.
Results: The analysis presents a novel approach to polarity sensitivity, incorporating both semantic properties and syntactic restrictions. It makes correct predictions about the acceptability of certain sentences, such as "Nobody's mother saw anybody's father."
Implications: This study contributes to a greater understanding of the syntax-semantics interface in language. It provides a more comprehensive explanation of polarity sensitivity than previous proposals, and its use of programming language concepts opens up new avenues for research in computational linguistics.
Link to Article: https://arxiv.org/abs/0404007v1 Authors: arXiv ID: 0404007v1