Paolo Liberatore: Difference between revisions

From Simple Sci Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "Title: Paolo Liberatore Main Research Question: How efficient are the popular methods DPLL and resolution for solving the problem of propositional satisfiability, and how hard is it to make the optimal choices during execution? Methodology: The study uses mathematical analysis and computational complexity theory to investigate the efficiency of DPLL and resolution algorithms. It compares the complexity of making optimal choices in these algorithms, such as choosing th..."
 
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Title: Paolo Liberatore
Title: Paolo Liberatore


Main Research Question: How efficient are the popular methods DPLL and resolution for solving the problem of propositional satisfiability, and how hard is it to make the optimal choices during execution?
Main Research Question: How does the knowledge of a solution to a similar instance affect the complexity of solving a problem when the instance changes?


Methodology: The study uses mathematical analysis and computational complexity theory to investigate the efficiency of DPLL and resolution algorithms. It compares the complexity of making optimal choices in these algorithms, such as choosing the best literal to branch on in DPLL or selecting the right pair of clauses to resolve in resolution.
Methodology: The study uses the theory of NP-completeness and compilability, two key concepts in the field of computer science complexity. The authors consider two scenarios: when only a solution of a previous instance is known, and when additional information, found during the search for this solution, is also known.


Results: The study proves that choosing the optimal literal to branch on in DPLL is ∆p[logn]-hard and becomes NPPP-hard if branching is only allowed on a subset of variables. Optimal choice in resolution is both NP-hard and coNP-hard. The problem of determining the size of the optimal proofs is also analyzed, and previous hardness results are enhanced.
Results: The authors provide complexity results for various problems, such as satisfiability, planning, and vertex cover. They show that the presence of both constraints and hints (in this case, the solution of a similar instance) can affect the complexity of solving the problem.


Implications: These results suggest that making optimal choices in DPLL and resolution can be computationally challenging, potentially leading to increased computational complexity and time. This could have implications for the practical implementation and efficiency of these algorithms. The study also contributes to the ongoing discussion about the automatizability of these methods, providing insights into their potential limitations.
Implications: This research has implications for the field of computer science and problem-solving in general. It highlights the importance of considering both constraints and hints when analyzing the complexity of problems, especially in scenarios where instances may change over time. The findings can help inform the development of more efficient algorithms and problem-solving strategies in various domains.


Link to Article: https://arxiv.org/abs/0209032v1
Link to Article: https://arxiv.org/abs/0402053v1
Authors:  
Authors:  
arXiv ID: 0209032v1
arXiv ID: 0402053v1
 
[[Category:Computer Science]]
[[Category:Complexity]]
[[Category:Solution]]
[[Category:Instance]]
[[Category:Solving]]
[[Category:Problem]]

Latest revision as of 15:27, 24 December 2023

Title: Paolo Liberatore

Main Research Question: How does the knowledge of a solution to a similar instance affect the complexity of solving a problem when the instance changes?

Methodology: The study uses the theory of NP-completeness and compilability, two key concepts in the field of computer science complexity. The authors consider two scenarios: when only a solution of a previous instance is known, and when additional information, found during the search for this solution, is also known.

Results: The authors provide complexity results for various problems, such as satisfiability, planning, and vertex cover. They show that the presence of both constraints and hints (in this case, the solution of a similar instance) can affect the complexity of solving the problem.

Implications: This research has implications for the field of computer science and problem-solving in general. It highlights the importance of considering both constraints and hints when analyzing the complexity of problems, especially in scenarios where instances may change over time. The findings can help inform the development of more efficient algorithms and problem-solving strategies in various domains.

Link to Article: https://arxiv.org/abs/0402053v1 Authors: arXiv ID: 0402053v1