The Next Frontier for Openness: Wireless Communications: Difference between revisions
Created page with "Title: The Next Frontier for Openness: Wireless Communications Research Question: How can wireless communications be made more open and competitive to benefit users and innovators? Methodology: The study examines the current state of wireless communications and compares it to other industries that have embraced openness. It also analyzes the impact of current policies on competition and innovation. Results: The research found that wireless communications in the United..." |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Significance: This research highlights the importance of openness in wireless communications and suggests policy changes to promote greater competition and innovation. By understanding the benefits of openness, policymakers and industry leaders can work towards creating a more competitive and innovative wireless industry. | Significance: This research highlights the importance of openness in wireless communications and suggests policy changes to promote greater competition and innovation. By understanding the benefits of openness, policymakers and industry leaders can work towards creating a more competitive and innovative wireless industry. | ||
Link to Article: https://arxiv.org/abs/ | Link to Article: https://arxiv.org/abs/0109102v3 | ||
Authors: | Authors: | ||
arXiv ID: | arXiv ID: 0109102v3 | ||
[[Category:Computer Science]] | [[Category:Computer Science]] | ||
Latest revision as of 03:06, 24 December 2023
Title: The Next Frontier for Openness: Wireless Communications
Research Question: How can wireless communications be made more open and competitive to benefit users and innovators?
Methodology: The study examines the current state of wireless communications and compares it to other industries that have embraced openness. It also analyzes the impact of current policies on competition and innovation.
Results: The research found that wireless communications in the United States have not embraced openness as much as other industries. This is due to policies that foster competition but not openness. These policies have led to vertically integrated providers, reduced hardware and software innovation, limited user choice, and restricted content access.
Implications: To address these issues and create more competition, one policy is likely to suffice: a Carterfone for wireless, coupled with more unlicensed spectrum. This would allow for more direct access to consumers by competitors, fostering innovation and increasing user choice.
Significance: This research highlights the importance of openness in wireless communications and suggests policy changes to promote greater competition and innovation. By understanding the benefits of openness, policymakers and industry leaders can work towards creating a more competitive and innovative wireless industry.
Link to Article: https://arxiv.org/abs/0109102v3 Authors: arXiv ID: 0109102v3