Foundations of Model Selection: Difference between revisions

From Simple Sci Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "Title: Foundations of Model Selection Research Question: How can we determine the best model for explaining a given set of data, considering the complexity of the model and the amount of data? Methodology: The researchers proposed a method called "model selection," which involves minimizing a two-part code consisting of a model subject to complexity constraints, and a data-to-model code. This method is based on Kolmogorov complexity, which measures the minimal length o..."
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Title: Foundations of Model Selection
Title: Foundations of Model Selection


Research Question: How can we determine the best model for explaining a given set of data, considering the complexity of the model and the amount of data?
Research Question: How can we determine the best model for explaining a given set of data, especially when considering model complexity?


Methodology: The researchers proposed a method called "model selection," which involves minimizing a two-part code consisting of a model subject to complexity constraints, and a data-to-model code. This method is based on Kolmogorov complexity, which measures the minimal length of a program that can generate a given data set.
Methodology: The authors propose a new approach to model selection called Kolmogorov's structure function. This function measures the relationship between the individual data and its explanation (model), and can be expressed as a two-part code consisting of a model description and a data-to-model code. The authors also consider a one-part code consisting of just the data-to-model code.


Results: The researchers found that minimizing the two-part code produces a model of best fit, meaning the data is maximally "typical." They also showed that both the structure function and the minimum randomness deficiency function can assume all shapes over their full domains, improving on previous results. They provided an explicit realization of optimal two-part codes at all levels of model complexity.
Results: The main result of this study is that minimizing the two-part code or the one-part code always selects a model that is a "best explanation" of the data within given model-complexity constraints. This means that the best fit cannot be computationally monotonically approximated, but the two-part code or the one-part code can be monotonically minimized, allowing for an approximation of the best-fitting model.


Implications: This research provides a foundation for Model-Based Coding (MBC) and related methods in model selection. It shows that the minimal randomness deficiency function, which measures maximal "typicality," cannot be monotonically approximated, but the shortest two-part code can. This has implications for the field of machine learning and data analysis, as it offers a new approach to model selection that takes into account both the complexity of the model and the amount of data.
Implications: This research has significant implications for the field of statistics and learning theory. It suggests that the traditional probabilistic approach to measuring goodness of selection may not always be relevant, especially in cases where the part of the support of the probability density function that will ever be observed has about zero measure. The authors' approach provides a more practical solution to selecting the best model for explaining a given set of data, especially considering model complexity.


Link to Article: https://arxiv.org/abs/0204037v1
Link to Article: https://arxiv.org/abs/0204037v2
Authors:  
Authors:  
arXiv ID: 0204037v1
arXiv ID: 0204037v2


[[Category:Computer Science]]
[[Category:Computer Science]]
[[Category:Model]]
[[Category:Model]]
[[Category:Code]]
[[Category:Part]]
[[Category:Data]]
[[Category:Data]]
[[Category:Complexity]]
[[Category:Best]]
[[Category:Selection]]
[[Category:Can]]

Revision as of 05:02, 24 December 2023

Title: Foundations of Model Selection

Research Question: How can we determine the best model for explaining a given set of data, especially when considering model complexity?

Methodology: The authors propose a new approach to model selection called Kolmogorov's structure function. This function measures the relationship between the individual data and its explanation (model), and can be expressed as a two-part code consisting of a model description and a data-to-model code. The authors also consider a one-part code consisting of just the data-to-model code.

Results: The main result of this study is that minimizing the two-part code or the one-part code always selects a model that is a "best explanation" of the data within given model-complexity constraints. This means that the best fit cannot be computationally monotonically approximated, but the two-part code or the one-part code can be monotonically minimized, allowing for an approximation of the best-fitting model.

Implications: This research has significant implications for the field of statistics and learning theory. It suggests that the traditional probabilistic approach to measuring goodness of selection may not always be relevant, especially in cases where the part of the support of the probability density function that will ever be observed has about zero measure. The authors' approach provides a more practical solution to selecting the best model for explaining a given set of data, especially considering model complexity.

Link to Article: https://arxiv.org/abs/0204037v2 Authors: arXiv ID: 0204037v2