ICANN's Selection of New Top-Level Domains: A Case Study in Regulatory Oversight

Title: ICANN's Selection of New Top-Level Domains: A Case Study in Regulatory Oversight

Research Question: How did ICANN's selection process for new top-level domains impact its regulatory oversight, and what were the consequences of this process?

Methodology: The study utilized a case study approach, examining ICANN's selection process for new top-level domains and its subsequent regulatory oversight. The research was based on primary sources, including email communications, ICANN documents, and media reports, as well as secondary sources, such as academic literature and expert opinions.

Results: The research found that ICANN's selection process for new top-level domains was marked by significant dysfunction and controversy. The process was described as "torturous," "channeling the spirit of Disney," and "bizarre," reflecting widespread criticism and confusion. This led to a prolonged and complex negotiation process for the contracts between ICANN and the selected registries, resulting in extensive regulation of the registries' operations by ICANN.

Implications: The study suggests that ICANN's approach to selecting new top-level domains and its subsequent regulatory oversight has had significant implications for the domain name system. The prolonged negotiation process and extensive regulation may have contributed to delays and increased costs, while also raising questions about ICANN's authority and transparency. The case study provides valuable insights into the challenges of regulatory oversight in the domain name system and the potential consequences of these challenges for stakeholders.

Link to Article: https://arxiv.org/abs/0109099v3 Authors: arXiv ID: 0109099v3